The Impact of Generative AI on Data Practitioners

As a data practitioner, it's hard not to be curious and perhaps concerned about how Generative AI (GenAI) will impact your profession. The reality is, we’re already in the middle of a major shift, one that's unfolding in distinct phases. For those responsible for making decisions about the future of data teams, including budget holders, analytics executives, and practitioners themselves, understanding these phases is critical to staying ahead.

Generative AI has rapidly moved from a theoretical concept to a tangible reality in data science and analytics. Its promise of automation and intelligent insights at scale is reshaping how businesses approach data roles. However, with this transformation comes a range of implications, both for the individuals funding these roles and for those occupying them. While this revolution will create opportunities for those who adapt, it will also replace roles that rely too heavily on rote, rule-based tasks. In this article, we’ll break down these phases and what each means for the future of data practitioners.

Phase 1: Unqualified Budget Holders Are Misunderstanding AI’s Capabilities

Who it impacts:

✅ Budget holders funding data projects

✅ Analytics executives tasked with staffing data teams

✅ Practitioners in data roles under threat from misinformed decisions

One of the earliest and most dangerous misconceptions emerging from the GenAI revolution is the belief that AI can fully replace human expertise in all data-centric roles. Unfortunately, budget holders, often lacking experience in hiring for or managing data functions, are making this assumption. This is not just speculation, this is happening right now, and it’s a trend that is affecting real-world decisions.

Budget holders are responsible for securing funding for data teams, but many come from non-data backgrounds. They may have a surface-level understanding of AI’s potential but lack insight into the nuances of data work. As a result, they see the shiny promise of AI and think it can replace data analysts, engineers, and other practitioners, without recognizing the need for human oversight, expertise, and strategy.

If your job is funded by such a budget holder, you are right to be concerned. These decision-makers may cut roles prematurely or expect too much from AI, leading to ineffective data operations and potentially leaving businesses without the necessary human insight to interpret complex datasets.

For budget holders and analytics executives, it’s crucial to understand that while GenAI can automate tasks, the strategic thinking and deep contextual understanding provided by skilled data professionals remain irreplaceable — at least for now.

Phase 2: Automation Will Replace Rule-Based Data Roles

Who it impacts:

✅ Data engineers and analysts who rely on established best practices

✅ Executives looking to streamline and automate data functions

As GenAI technology advances, we will see the second phase of its impact: the replacement of data practitioners who rely solely on best practices. This phase specifically targets those whose work is rule-based, systematic, and follows established processes that can be easily automated.

In this phase, data engineers and analysts who excel in following best practices but lack the ability to adapt, innovate, or question those practices with experience-backed insights will be most at risk. AI thrives on tasks that follow strict rules, making repetitive data processes, such as data cleaning or reporting, prime candidates for automation.

Data practitioners need to evolve beyond simply following checklists. The future will favor those who can bring creativity and problem-solving to the table, using their understanding of business contexts, data intricacies, and industry-specific nuances to generate unique insights that AI cannot produce alone. For executives, this is the time to rethink how your data teams operate. Are they simply following a rulebook, or are they bringing real intellectual capital to your business?

Phase 3: Human Expertise Will Reign in Uncertainty

Who it impacts:

✅ Data practitioners working in industries with high-stakes decisions

✅ Executives managing data teams in regulated or complex industries

As businesses start to implement AI more extensively, they will eventually hit the limitations of machine intelligence. One major limitation of GenAI is its difficulty in dealing with uncertainty. AI is only as good as the data it's trained on, which means it struggles when dealing with ambiguous or incomplete data, or in situations where human intuition and context are needed to make high-stakes decisions.

In industries where mistakes are extremely costly, industries like healthcare, finance, aerospace, etc., businesses will soon realize that they cannot afford to trust AI alone. In these fields, data practitioners who can navigate uncertainty through deep knowledge and expertise will become highly valued. Their ability to interpret complex datasets, ask the right questions, and apply a nuanced understanding of the industry will make them indispensable.

Unfortunately, for practitioners working in digital-first, low-cost industries, the story may be different. Here, the focus will likely remain on driving down costs, meaning tasks will continue to be shifted to the cheapest provider, be it human or AI. For those in such sectors, pivoting towards roles that require managing uncertainty or developing expertise in AI oversight could be the key to maintaining relevance.

Phase 4: The Monetization of Employee Work Data

Who it impacts:

✅ Data practitioners skilled in data capture and processing

✅ Executives looking to unlock new revenue streams from internal data

The final phase of the GenAI revolution will be characterized by a profound shift in how companies view their data, not just the data they collect from customers or markets, but the data produced by their employees’ work itself. There is a staggering amount of untapped value in the work processes that happen within a company, and many businesses are only just starting to recognize this.

In the near future, companies will start monitoring, measuring, and capturing data about how their employees work, turning this into valuable datasets that can be sold to other organizations. Imagine a scenario where every action, every click, decision, and process, is recorded, organized, and cleaned, creating a new source of data to feed into AI models. This data could be used by AI companies to improve their algorithms or by competitors looking for insights into productivity.

For data practitioners who understand this new wave of data collection, there will be a wealth of opportunities. Companies will need experts to capture, clean, organize, and label this data, and those with the right skill sets will be paid extremely well for their expertise. Analytics executives should start considering how their organization can turn this work data into a strategic asset and ensure their teams are prepared to handle this next evolution in data strategy.


Preparing for the AI Future

For those responsible for managing data teams, funding projects, or working directly in the trenches of data work, it’s essential to recognize the phases of GenAI adoption and what they mean for your career and organization.

✅ Budget holders must resist the temptation to view AI as a wholesale replacement for data professionals and instead focus on where human expertise can add value.

✅ Analytics executives should critically assess their teams’ adaptability and look to foster creativity and problem-solving, not just adherence to best practices.

✅ Data practitioners need to shift away from routine, rule-based tasks and toward strategic roles that involve managing uncertainty and creating value from new forms of data.

AI is here to stay, but the practitioners who thrive will be those who evolve with it, continuously sharpening their expertise in areas where AI falls short. The question is no longer if AI will impact your job, but how you will respond to the inevitable transformation it brings.

If you’re interested in exploring this topic in more depth or want to understand how to position your data team for the future, contact me, jason, CEO of 33 Sticks. Let’s discuss how to navigate this AI-driven transformation and ensure your organization stays ahead of the curve.

jason thompson

Jason Thompson is the CEO and co-founder of 33 Sticks, a boutique analytics company focused on helping businesses make human-centered decisions through data. He regularly speaks on topics related to data literacy and ethical analytics practices and is the co-author of the analytics children’s book ‘A is for Analytics’

https://www.hippieceolife.com/
Previous
Previous

Everyone Hates Popups But……They Work!!!

Next
Next

The Limitations of "Getting Close to Revenue" in Digital Analytics