Exposing the Flaws in Analytics Platform Migrations

TL;DR: The digital analytics industry is facing significant issues as major platforms like Google and Adobe have or are currently pushing for migrations to GA4 and Customer Journey Analytics (CJA). These migrations have been plagued by poor implementation, largely due to over-reliance on large consulting firms and low-cost subcontractors whom are lacking expertise. This has resulted in frustrated clients, failed projects, and a tarnished industry reputation. However, smaller agencies have an opportunity to step up by focusing on quality, transparency, and client education. The industry must realign incentives, demand transparency, and foster innovation to create a client-first ecosystem that prioritizes genuine customer success over vendor-driven sales goals. This is a call to action to reclaim the industry from monopolistic practices and build a better future for digital analytics.

In recent years, the digital analytics industry has experienced a significant shift as major players like Google and Adobe push for widespread platform migrations. While these transitions have promised enhanced capabilities and insights, they have also exposed deep-seated issues within the industry.

Today, we will explore the current state of affairs, examining the challenges, consequences, and potential solutions for businesses navigating this complex landscape.

The Migration Misstep

Google's transition from Universal Analytics (UA) to GA4 and Adobe's move from Adobe Analytics Legacy to Customer Journey Analytics (CJA) have been promoted as revolutionary. However, the implementation process has been far from smooth, as both tech giants have relied heavily on a select group of "elite partners" to handle these migrations, a strategy that has backfired in many ways.

Why Are Migrations Failing?

  1. Outsourcing and Quality Issues:
    Large consulting firms are often chosen to handle these migrations. These firms, spoon-fed the work by the vendors, frequently outsource it to subcontractors, often located in regions with historically low wages. These subcontractors often lack expertise or real-world experience in data engineering projects, leading to subpar implementations that fail to meet client expectations.

  2. Misaligned Incentives:
    The partnership between vendors and large consulting firms has created a conflict of interest, where vendors prioritize sales channels over client satisfaction. The poor-quality work delivered by these elite partners is often overlooked due to the large volume of revenue they generate for the vendors.

  3. Lack of Oversight:
    Both vendors and their partners exhibit insufficient quality control. Vendors, eager to protect their revenue, ignore implementation quality, while partners provide minimal oversight to subcontractors. As a result, clients bear the brunt of poor implementations without proper guidance or support.

The Ripple Effect

The fallout from these failed migrations goes beyond mere inconvenience:

  • Customer Exodus:
    Frustrated by underperforming implementations, some customers are abandoning Google and Adobe, reshaping market dynamics.

  • Industry Reputation:
    The digital analytics industry is suffering reputational damage as companies begin to question the value of these advanced platforms.

  • Market Monopolization:
    The over-reliance on large consulting firms is stifling competition and innovation from smaller agencies, creating a monopolistic environment.


A Silver Lining for Smaller Agencies

Despite this grim outlook, there are opportunities for smaller, more agile agencies to capitalize on the situation:

  • Quality Over Quantity:
    Smaller agencies can differentiate themselves by focusing on high-quality, personalized data projects that meet client needs.

  • Transparency and Education:
    By educating clients on the pitfalls of the current ecosystem, smaller agencies can position themselves as trusted advisors.

  • Specialization:
    Niche expertise and a deep understanding of specific industries or technologies can give smaller agencies a competitive edge.

A Way Forward

To address these industry-wide issues and create a more equitable, client-focused ecosystem, several steps must be taken:

  • Client Empowerment:
    Businesses should conduct thorough research and seek independent advice before committing to platform migrations or engaging large consulting firms, especially those recommended by software vendors.

  • Vendor Accountability:
    Major players like Google and Adobe must actively ensure the quality of their partners' implementations.

  • Industry Advocacy:
    Smaller agencies and industry leaders should push for greater transparency and a level playing field that prioritizes client outcomes over vendor-driven sales goals.

  • Continuous Education:
    Both clients and practitioners must commit to ongoing learning to stay ahead of the rapid changes in digital analytics and avoid getting caught in fear-driven sales traps set by vendors and agencies.


Breaking the Monopoly

Our industry is at a critical juncture. We must dismantle the monopolistic structures that prioritize vendor revenue and partner sales over genuine customer success. The current ecosystem, dominated by a handful of large players, is not just unsustainable and it is actively harming the industry's progress and the customers we jointly serve.

The future of our industry hinges on our collective ability to:

  1. Break the Monopoly:
    We must dismantle the stranglehold large consulting firms and vendor partners have on the market. Supporting smaller, agile agencies that prioritize quality and client outcomes is essential.

  2. Demand Transparency:
    Clients, practitioners, and industry leaders must unite in demanding full transparency from vendors and their partners. Shady practices and misaligned incentives must end.

  3. Realign Incentives:
    The industry needs a fundamental shift in how success is measured. Instead of prioritizing sales figures and partner revenues, we must create systems that value and incentivize customer outcomes and long-term success.

  4. Empower Customer Choice:
    By educating customers and providing unbiased information, we can empower them to make choices that serve their needs rather than vendors' sales goals.

  5. Foster Innovation:
    Breaking monopolistic barriers will create space for true innovation, allowing new ideas and technologies to flourish without being stifled by entrenched interests.


The stakes are incredibly high. If we fail to act, we risk perpetuating a system that undermines the very foundations of our industry of trust, innovation, and customer success. However, by taking strong action to reshape the digital analytics landscape, we can create a future where digital analytics serves its purpose of providing businesses with the insights they need to thrive in the digital age.

This is not just a call for change, it's a rallying cry for a revolution in the digital analytics industry.

The future of our field depends on our willingness to challenge the status quo, prioritize genuine value creation, and build an ecosystem that puts customer outcomes at the forefront.

The path forward will be challenging, but the rewards for our customers, our industry, and ourselves will be immeasurable.

jason thompson

Jason Thompson is the CEO and co-founder of 33 Sticks, a boutique analytics company focused on helping businesses make human-centered decisions through data. He regularly speaks on topics related to data literacy and ethical analytics practices and is the co-author of the analytics children’s book ‘A is for Analytics’

https://www.hippieceolife.com/
Previous
Previous

The Critical Imperative of Analytics Independence

Next
Next

Why We Created 'A is for Analytics'